daca de exemplu eu dau un joc, sa zicem Agricola, si 5 categorii (sa zicem Componente, Mecanica, Gameplay, Complexitate, Fun Factor) si fiecare de pe forum isi spune in cateva cuvinte parerea la fiecare categorie (cat un tweet sau un SMS de mare, sau poate mai mare, nu stiu), apoi eu le iau si le strang intr-un singur "review" pe toate (le agreg) oare ce ar iesi?
sunteti interesati de un astfel de experiment? v-ar lua probabil maxim 5-10 minute sa va expuneti opinia.
Exemplu de agregare de review-uri al userului EndersGame de pe BGG de care am mai vorbit ca are super review-uri (aici sunt fragmente din review-urile altora):
About the artwork:
"The 1st Mayfair Edition ... has a horrible board that makes it look like you're building a civilization in Antartica." - Nicolas Boulo
"Mayfair edition 1 is the worst graphically. It's too busy." - candoo
"I think the second edition has the prettier artwork, but the artwork of the first edition looks much clearer and you can distinguish the different kind of tiles better." - Berthold Nüchter (comment on German editions)
About the expansion map and advanced game:
"If you never wanted to play the advanced game, you wouldn't need the extra components. The advanced game is intended for long time T&E players that want to add something new, like an expansion." - droberts441
"The base game offers a lot of gameplay and replayability. The variants/additions are not necessary. You could use any cube or marker to denote the extra civilization buildings." - candoo
"I don't care that much about the extra monuments and the second board. The base game has an extraordinary longevity/replayability by itself. No extra chrome is needed in my humble opinion." - Guillaume Gallais
